Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Daily Online Examiner: How Dumping IP Logs Helped News Site Preserve Readers' Privacy


By Wendy Davis, Tuesday, November 10, 2009 SUBSCRIBE  |  RSS  |  REPLY TO EDITOR  |  MEDIAPOST

How Dumping IP Logs Helped News Site Preserve Readers' Privacy
In a stunning show of disrespect for civil liberties, the federal authorities recently attempted to subpoena the IP addresses of Web visitors to the left-wing news site Indymedia.us, the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation reports.

Not only did the government attempt to obtain all IP addresses of people who visited on a particular day -- June 25, 2008 -- but authorities also ordered site administrator Kristina Clair to keep quiet about the subpoena. "This overbroad demand for internet records not only violated federal privacy law but also violated Clair's First Amendment rights," the EFF states in a new post about the case.

Given that judges and lawmakers have long protected people's right to read anonymously, it's hard to imagine any scenario in which the government could legitimately demand to learn the identities of all readers of a lawful Web site.

As it turns out, Indymedia.us destroys IP logs after five weeks, so Clair wasn't able to comply with the subpoena, which was issued in January. The EFF also convinced the government to back off its demand that Clair keep quiet about the subpoena.

Nonetheless, this incident marks more than just an example of government overreaching. It demonstrates that one sure way to guarantee Web users' privacy is to destroy information that could be used to identify individuals.

Privacy advocates have warned repeatedly that merely keeping records about Web visitors can potentially compromise their privacy. The advocates argue that when information exists, it can be obtained; the government can subpoena it, or people can hack into databases, or employees can simply release it.

Consumer advocates have often said that search engines shouldn't keep log files tying queries to IP addresses, on the theory that storing the information itself puts users' privacy at risk. Groups like the EFF have also said that the Google Books settlement shouldn't go through without enforceable privacy protections for online readers.

Critics tend to say that privacy advocates are just being paranoid, and that policy shouldn't be shaped by unlikely worst-case possibilities. But this recent attempt to subpoena Indymedia's IP logs shows that the worst-case privacy scenarios aren't that far-fetched after all.

 
You are receiving this newsletter at phamquochuy1980.haiphong@blogger.com as part of your free membership with MediaPost. If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - www.mediapost.com - and click on [subscribe] in the e-newsletter box.
For advertising opportunities see our online media kit.
 
If you'd rather not receive this newsletter in the future click here.
 
email powered by eROIWe welcome and appreciate forwarding of our newsletters in their entirety or in part with proper attribution.
(c) 2009 MediaPost Communications, 1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001


Read rest of entry

Section 3 - Feedback Loop

    Judge: Tweeting Is Broadcasting, So Courtroom Tweets Are Out by Wendy Davis (Daily Online Examiner - Nov 9) 5 replies in last 24 hours; 5 replies total
  1. David Hawthorne from HCI LearningWorks commented on Nov 10, 11:47 AM
    Judge Land's ruling is correct. The technology is irrelevant. If there is a credible threat to the integrity of the trial caused by reporting in real-time, the court has an obligation to prevent it. On the other hand, if the court hasn't barred "real-time" reporting (or the use of any and all means of transmitting the proceedings in real-time beyond the boundaries of the courtroom) then, tweeting, or any means, should be permitted. We are supposed to have public trials in this country as a means of assuring justince. If a claimant, prosecutor or defendant feels 'real-time' transmission could harm their ability to get a fair and just trial, let them show cause, and let the judge make a decision. It's not about technology. Imagine the real-time transmission of a divorce proceeding. In the age of "social networks" it wouldn't... - Read more

  2. Russell Cross from Prentke Romich commented on Nov 10, 10:36 AM
    Oddly enough, I find myself on the side of the judge with this one. Texting IS instantaneous communication (well duh, that's the whole point of Twitter!) and NOT the same as taking notes at all. Effectively you are allowing a blow by blow live transmission of a case (and also allowing tweets to come BACK to the reporter).

    I'm not convinced that any court case is so critical that waiting until you get out of the room is too much to ask. The "public interest" can hold out until the judge says "dismissed" and the "need" to tweet live is no more than the desire to be first to report.

  3. Christopher West from SEO Works commented on Nov 9, 7:15 PM
    Tweeting is another way to deliver your message, and not allowing a reporter to tweet in a courthouse would be like not allowing them to take notes (IMHO).

    What does the justice system have to hide if it won't allow this?

  4. Read more replies by:
    Brian Hayashi, ConnectMe 360 (Nov 9, 6:11 PM)
    Paula Lynn, Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@gmail.com (Nov 9, 5:57 PM)
  5. Join this conversation.
  6. What Hath Apple Wrought? by Philip Leigh (Video Insider - Nov 9) 5 replies in last 24 hours; 5 replies total
  7. Phil Leigh from Inside Digital Media, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 10:33 AM
    First, I am not an Apple shareholder.

    Second, the source for the mobile web browsing statistics is provided as conveniently as possible with a hyperlink within the text of the post.

  8. Kevin Lenard from Business Development Specialist commented on Nov 10, 9:11 AM
    Regardless of the numbers, great piece on the underlying, long-term impact of a brilliantly designed gadget.

    The iPhone has proved to be a 'category killer', both because of its user interface (touch screen, operating system and mobile access) and its apps (open source for developers and shared revenue model). As distribution spread globally and competitors move in, this one device has accelerated mobile Internet use exponentially. That is brilliant corporate leadership and evidence of not just being creative with technological innovation, but combining that with business model reinvention/innovation.

    Nice historical clip regarding the iTablet here: http://preview.tinyurl.com/yd36jy9

    Plus some insights into what Google's "Wave", in combination with mobile browsing, could mean to making any marketing done on the Internet global, not local or national: p://preview.tinyurl.com/ydpyc5r

  9. Nick Schooler from Cardlogix commented on Nov 10, 6:02 AM
    Apple definitely gots what it takes to push the iSlate beyond a standard tablet. islate.org

  10. Read more replies by:
    Malcolm Rasala, Real Creatives Worldwide (Nov 10, 4:50 AM)
    Howie Goldfarb, Sky Pulse Media (Nov 9, 8:30 PM)
  11. Join this conversation.
  12. Finding That One Blue Marble by Kaila Colbin (Search Insider - Nov 10) 3 replies in last 24 hours; 3 replies total
  13. Alexander Valencia from WeDOwebContent.com commented on Nov 10, 12:57 PM
    Cheers KC.

    To good times with great people and to the blue marble that afforded many underprivileged children and families the opportunity to learn how to search, and be safe online with a shiny new HP computer.

  14. Carolyn Allen from California Green Solutions commented on Nov 10, 12:05 PM
    Good points...both about learning while you are searching...and having that big ole' Lab go hunting for his food :-) The new search tools coming online are helpful both for finding a specific solution, ie: green solution for LED lights, and for learning about options you had not yet considered, such as "energy efficiency solutions for lights" We are specializing to the nth degree these days...and SEO is putting the "devil" into the details :-)

  15. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@gmail.com commented on Nov 10, 11:03 AM
    A 20 second search teaches patience? Who are you kidding?

  16. Join this conversation.
  17. Newspaper Execs And Readers View Online News Availability Differently by Jack Loechner (Research Brief - Nov 10) 3 replies in last 24 hours; 3 replies total
  18. Jonathan Mirow from BroadbandVideo, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 12:04 PM
    Broken record time: the only two things you can charge for online are financial information (because it makes you more money) and adult content for reasons I'm sure are clear to most. Almost every OTHER paid-content model online has failed. Seriously, I read the print paper in the morning and get news online all day from Yahoo. If the Denver Post goes out of business (along with the Rocky) then I won't read the printed version. If the Post website charges for content I (and 95% of those who currently use the site) simply won't go there. The key is for these online entities to find new and interactive ways to attract advertisers - not to charge for what they're currently giving away. I've said it before and I'll say it again (pay attention DNA) A Paid Hulu is a... - Read more

  19. Les Blatt from Freelance New Media Person commented on Nov 10, 9:54 AM
    The disconnect seems to me to be on the question of how easily online content could be replaced, and by whom. There really is little difference between users and providers when it comes to considering online news and information very or somewhat valuable: 95% of users and 93% of providers. So far, so good. But the next table shows that when asked how easy it would be to replace online content if a particular news site chose to put it behind a subscription wall, only 31% of the providers thought it would be very or somewhat easy to replace - compared with 52% of their readers. That's a pretty significant disconnect, and it ought to be a warning bell for providers.

  20. Adam Day from Marketing-Research Associates, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 9:48 AM
    Newspapers need to keep online and mobile readership free. This is coming from 22 years of newspaper consulting expereince. I read the NYTimes several times a day on my IPhone. There is a bottom banner ad constantly in view. Advertising revenue has always been greater than circulation revenue and advertising prices are dependent on readership. That's a simple formula to understand where your bread is buttered. Focus on delivering advertising to readership.

  21. Join this conversation.
  22. Murdoch Rages Against The Machine, Calls Search Giants 'Kleptos' by Laurie Sullivan (Search Marketing Daily - Nov 9) 3 replies in last 24 hours; 3 replies total
  23. Tim Knol from The Mayoros Agency commented on Nov 10, 9:43 AM
    Newspapers haven't really charged for content for years. They are in the business of selling advertising, not news content. They've charged subscription fees to cover the cost of fullfilling those subscriptions. Printing presses, ink, paper, circulation and delivery staff. Advertising revenue has really paid the salary of the newsroom staff. The Internet makes delivery of that free content more cost effective. The problem is not failing to charge for content, it is failing to market (or deliver) a newspaper website that is just as good or better than the print version.

  24. Ryan Healey from PLATTWORX commented on Nov 9, 8:45 PM
    He is absolutely right. The newspaper industry made a major mistake when they sent their news stories out free to search engines after paying all the costs to produce them (salaries, etc.) They are PRODUCT and now the public thinks it no longer has to pay for local news, they can just search and get it for free so they are cancelling "needless" newspaper subscriptions. Why pay for news when it's free?

    News Corp is doing something that will add value to it's papers and should be followed by all newspaper companies. Sure, there are other sources of national and world news, but only your local newspaper covers your local news from your own city. It doesn't get written and reported for nothing. Let a few newspapers in smaller cities and towns shyt down leaving citizens no local new sources and... - Read more

  25. Howie Goldfarb from Sky Pulse Media commented on Nov 9, 6:50 PM
    I am a big fan of Rupert Murdoch the businessman and he is 100% right about charging for content. We never had a problem pre-internet of paying for content. We either bought a newspaper or since it was pre-TiVo we watched commercials (or left the room for a minute). So now everyone expects all the same quality of content for free? I am willing to pay a subscription if the rate is reasonable. And with 20% of browsers Firefox that allows Ad blocking (yes even Google Ads from Search get blocked), what is the answer?

    The problem is too many news sources. Back in the day you had networks news, radio and your local paper. Now you have cable, TV, News Websites from around the world, radio, print etc etc. Too much content for too few consumers.

  26. Join this conversation.
  27. The Failure To (Completely) Serve by Derek Gordon (Search Insider - Nov 9) 2 replies in last 24 hours; 8 replies total
  28. steve plunkett from M/C/C commented on Nov 10, 10:55 AM
    Thanks Thom, I didnt think I was alone.

    <a href=http://www.dallasseoblog.com/2009/11/seo-is-voodoo-cmon-man-really.html>blog response</a>

  29. Thom Kennon from Wunderman commented on Nov 9, 5:27 PM
    "SEO as voodoo"? "Where's the traffic"? "Search as mystery"? Are you kidding me?!...

    You guys need to vet your guest writers a little more throughly. It is stunning that 13+ years after marketers started making a decent living engineering search - visibility, distribution, traffic, sales! - someone in a trade would publicly appear so clueless.

    TK

  30. Join this conversation. There are 6 more replies.
  31. Microsoft Bing Gives WiFi Users Free Search by Laurie Sullivan (Online Media Daily - Nov 9) 2 replies in last 24 hours; 4 replies total
  32. Matt Ellsworth from MJE Sales, LLC commented on Nov 9, 8:37 PM
    I think this is just another attempt to try to boost their "market share" numbers and hopefully gain a few users along the way.

    Would I do a search in exchange for free internet - of course - who wouldn't.

  33. Kamau Jackson from Internet Knowledge Solutions commented on Nov 9, 7:52 PM
    buying users?? is that like pay-per-click?

  34. Join this conversation. There are 2 more replies.
  35. Google To Acquire AdMob For $750 Million by Laurie Sullivan (Online Media Daily - Nov 9) 2 replies in last 24 hours; 4 replies total
  36. Matt Ellsworth from MJE Sales, LLC commented on Nov 9, 8:29 PM
    Other than the beta of google adsense for mobile which gave some great ads - admob was the only other mobile ad network I had ever heard of.

    Granted the ads that admob keeps showing me kind of suck.

  37. Howie Goldfarb from Sky Pulse Media commented on Nov 9, 6:09 PM
    I find this surprising. Eric Schmidt the CEO was interviewed recently by Business Week. He mentioned Mobile, and the desire to get involved with mobile advertising. Yet his idea of Mobile Advertising made me think he is not qualified to even be a janitor at Google. I know the guy is smart, just not about Mobile. So my guess is this guy hired someone very talented to make these decisions.

    Apple has a significant advantage to Google. Google lives to serve Ads. Apple lives to sell technology. So while every time someone creates Ad Blocking Software, it hurts Google and not Apple. And with the Tablet in the works with a larger screen for video/TV/Web in the works from Apple I would be betting on the technology to win vs Advertising just like it is winning the Mobile Phone arena.

  38. Join this conversation. There are 2 more replies.
  39. Razorfish Study: Special Offers Drive Engagement In Social Media by Mark Walsh (Online Media Daily - Nov 8) 2 replies in last 24 hours; 4 replies total
  40. Jonas Halpren from Federated Media commented on Nov 9, 7:20 PM
    Makes perfect sense. Social media is really what used to be referred to as "relationship marketing" or "1 to 1 marketing", both of which are DR tactics.

    Reality is, people need a reason to engage with a brand. And the best reason is usually a deal. period. Just more blurring of the lines between DR and brand.

  41. Kevin Horne from Lairig Marketing commented on Nov 9, 4:50 PM
    So social media marketing isn't so much about boosting brand awareness as enticing users with concrete offers. "That to me is a big 'Aha!, said Garrick Schmitt, Razorfish group vice president...

    Garrick, you need to get out more.

  42. Join this conversation. There are 2 more replies.
  43. A Baker's Doesn't - Or, Dueling Paddles: a Canoe Paddle Report (CPR) by Mitch Oscar (TV Board - Nov 10) 2 replies in last 24 hours; 2 replies total
  44. sheldon senzon from JMS Media, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 3:42 PM
    Thanks for the nostalgic walk down memory lane, less and less are around to remember the so called good old days. Seems there was a lot of passion for the radio business then and good clean competition amongst the major line networks. 35 years later the medium remains under appreciated and under valued as an advertising medium.

  45. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@gmail.com commented on Nov 10, 12:29 PM
    I worked in such a shark and baracuda infested waters. Not only were there us, the commission only salespeople working in the same area, but we were pitted against the salary sales department who were there for unpteen years and garnered accounts simply by processing insertion orders. Some of the antagonism slackened over time as most of us found a position, but overall it cost the company ticked off accounts, under served accounts and lost accounts. There were other details including horrendous management which added to the disparaties and downward slides, but the pit was the pit. Fortunately, I found how to navigate more successfully than others, but team work was not encouraged especially by management. If the sources you stated continues in that disorganization, there will be more time spent on inter-company squabbling than sales, production and billing. And you... - Read more

  46. Join this conversation.
  47. Eschew The Paradigm Of Obfuscation by Mickey Lonchar (Marketing Daily - Nov 10) 2 replies in last 24 hours; 2 replies total
  48. Andrea Learned from Learned On Women commented on Nov 10, 10:32 AM
    I'm wondering if the clients hiring these corporate-speaking marketers have gotten so used to it, they expect it and would not quite be ready for simple talk. It's almost as if we need a significant corporate culture shift to occur, so that both marketers and clients agree that speaking in a less corporate, non-obfuscating tongue is the choice for a solid, working and communicative relationship.

  49. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@gmail.com commented on Nov 10, 9:30 AM
    godlike information.

  50. Join this conversation.
  51. Is the Promise of Social Media Enough? What About ROI? by Jacob Morgan (Social Media Insider - Oct 29) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 27 replies total
  52. David Carter from Socialtality commented on Nov 10, 9:50 AM
    Scott makes an interesting point. Distinguishing social media as a communications channel rather than a more traditional media channel gets us closer to the proper mindset for approaching ROI for Social Media.

    Bravo Jacob for finally saying what needed to be said. Yes, we don't measure hard ROI for traditional media buys (unless there's a direct response mechanism). But you're right, it's no excuse not to measure it for Social Media Outreach.

    To further Scott's phone example, phones are a communications channel, a conduit for conversation with our customers. While we may not be able to quantify the precise ROI of having phones, we can certainly understand the cost of not having phones. And the cost incurred by slower, clunkier, less advanced ways of communicating: Snail mail, courier, etc.

    Missed customer service calls, inability to... - Read more

  53. Join this conversation. There are 26 more replies.
  54. Is Email Strategic? Or Dead? by Daniel Ambrose (Online Publishing Insider - Oct 29) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 13 replies total
  55. Mark Allen Roberts from Out of the Box Solutions, LLC commented on Nov 9, 6:25 PM
    Smart email marketing adds value.

    Unfortunately there seems to be an epidemic of poor email as I discuss in my blog: http://nosmokeandmirrors.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/its-an-epidemic-poorly-executed-email-marketing-campaigns/

    It's the "marketing tools" that I discuss in my blog that will be the death of email marketing.

    Mark Allen Roberts

    www.outbsolutions.com

  56. Join this conversation. There are 12 more replies.
  57. The Problem With Selling Ice To Eskimos by Ari Rosenberg (Online Publishing Insider - Nov 5) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 7 replies total
  58. Mark Allen Roberts from Out of the Box Solutions, LLC commented on Nov 9, 6:33 PM
    Market leading salespeople today create sales velocity as I discuss in my blog post: http://nosmokeandmirrors.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/20-top-entrepreneurial-best-practices-to-insure-2010-is-a-profitable-year/ and click #1.

    Ice to Eskimos implies selling something the buyer does not want or need....a market loser salesperson.

    Market leaders listen and connect their product or service as a solution to the known and understood buyer problems.

    Mark Allen Roberts www.outbsolutions.com

  59. Join this conversation. There are 6 more replies.
  60. Women Are Online, Shopping For Cosmetics by Stephen Reily (Engage:Boomers - Nov 2) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 6 replies total
  61. Tiffany Jonas from Aio Design LLC commented on Nov 10, 12:37 PM
    Jennifer, thanks for your post! I completely understand your reasoning. I've been fortunate where I purchase my cosmetics (an upscale salon/spa in my city) in that I don't encounter this atmosphere when I shop for cosmetics, but I can see that may not be the usual experience. (I'm GenX.)

    I was also wondering if boomer women find shopping in person to be more hostile due to being surrounded by signage and advertising featuring very young models, if they're treated differently because of their age or appearance, and the like. Are there any boomers here who can weigh in?

  62. Join this conversation. There are 5 more replies.
  63. H1N1 Vaccine: A Generation Gap? by Anne Mai Bertelsen (Engage:Boomers - Nov 9) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 5 replies total
  64. Anne Mai Bertelsen from MAi Strategies commented on Nov 9, 4:57 PM
    Thanks for these comments. You might want to read today's New York Times in addition. Dr. Perri Klass shares insights about the polio vaccine from David Oshinsky whose won a Pulitzer prize for his work Polio: An American Story. I really didn't know she was going to write this when I wrote my piece. Here's the link. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/health/10klas.html

  65. Join this conversation. There are 4 more replies.
  66. Search Engine LeapFish Merges Real-Time Data And Social Content by Laurie Sullivan (Online Media Daily - Nov 5) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 4 replies total
  67. Ramaswamy Ramasubbu from bitswoven technologies pvt ltd commented on Nov 9, 11:20 PM
    I think the credit goes for executing the plan boldly-it is fraught with landmines as there are many moving parts and it is difficult to control user experience when you have certain things not under your control. UGC can offend some searcher..we have the pains we combined our just in place utility findnearyou.com with social buzzmeter areapal.com and everyday was a battle to ensure good user experience.

    Not every one has to build a google...google never built a yahoo or msn style company

  68. Join this conversation. There are 3 more replies.
  69. How to Develop DROV (Direct Response Online Video) by Tod Sacerdoti (Video Insider - Aug 13) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 3 replies total
  70. Dennis Chang from commented on Nov 10, 11:33 AM
    Direct Response videos are still one of the best ways to get leads from people who are genuinely interested in the product. It's just up to the agency to come up with a creative video to attract viewers.

    Take this agency for example: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/11/prweb3168134.htm

  71. Join this conversation. There are 2 more replies.
  72. Secrets Do Make Friends by Clint Runge (Engage:Gen Y - Nov 6) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 3 replies total
  73. paul myers from 540 Productions commented on Nov 9, 7:42 PM
    Right on Clint. What next, directions to the "cool guy club" on Twitter and a video of the secret hand shake on YouTube?

    BTW Jeff, this goes way beyond social media!

  74. Join this conversation. There are 2 more replies.
  75. Google Eats AdMob: Round Up the Usual Suspects by Steve Smith (Mobile Insider - Nov 10) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  76. Tamara Gruber from Crisp Wireless commented on Nov 10, 4:16 PM
    Perfectly summarized! Google represents the behemoth of self-service performance advertising online and AdMob is the cream of the crop of performance advertising when it comes to mobile. Yes this partnership validates the market and the needs of the long-tail, but leaves plenty of room for others to address the needs of premium publishers and premium brand advertisers.

  77. Join this conversation.
  78. Fox News Pushes Live Web Video Effort by Joan Voight (Around the Net In Media - Nov 8) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  79. Jonathan Mirow from BroadbandVideo, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 3:53 PM
    Smart. If the newspapers had done this first - they'd be challenging broadcasters for advertising dollars. But did they listen? Nope - far too busy trying to figure out how to get a nickle per viewer for an AP Wire story rewrite.

  80. Join this conversation.
  81. The Secret Race For Permission: Facebook Vs. Google Vs. MySpace by Joe Marchese (Online Spin - Nov 10) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  82. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@gmail.com commented on Nov 10, 2:23 PM
    "If if is the peacemaker, much virtue in if." "I've got more time than money" in this case more space than money.

  83. Join this conversation.
  84. Dear Bev: What Do I Do When The Interviewer Doesn't Let Me Get A Word In Edgewise? by Beverly Weinstein (MediaDailyNews - Nov 9) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  85. jim watson from jwatsonexecutivesearch Inc commented on Nov 10, 1:30 PM
    great piece of advice - looking forward to your ongoing series jw

  86. Join this conversation.
  87. Pursuit Of 'Value' Is Grounded In Shifting Values by Jon Last (Marketing:Sports - Nov 10) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  88. Elana Cooper from PGA of America commented on Nov 10, 1:19 PM
    Jon, I agree with you that Sports properties need to stay away from competitive pricing models. Given today's tough environment we have to give value, reasonable prices that include added benefits and consistently good service. If we start getting into competitive price wars, we'll end up like national retailers where consumers wait for One Day Sales and 20% off coupons.

  89. Join this conversation.
  90. New Name: Radio Television Digital News Association (MediaDailyNews - Nov 10) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  91. Jonathan Mirow from BroadbandVideo, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 12:13 PM
    I've renamed the Titanic the "New Digital Titanic" - think that will help?

  92. Join this conversation.
  93. Flood Of DVDs Yields Cheaper Prices: Can TV Learn From This? by Wayne Friedman (TV Watch - Nov 10) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  94. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited; hollywood5459@gmail.com commented on Nov 10, 12:12 PM
    Bullseye with the additional there is consumer limited funds. The enough already will be here within the 2 years. Not long term stock investments.

  95. Join this conversation.
  96. Citadel, Salem Tune Out Revs by Erik Sass (MediaDailyNews - Nov 9) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  97. Jonathan Mirow from BroadbandVideo, Inc. commented on Nov 10, 12:10 PM
    Let's see, radio revs down again, Scripps Media (internet stuff) up - Martha, do you think this internet thing will catch on with the kids? I work right down the block from the radio graveyard (re: ClearChannel) - everyone who thinks radio is going to "turn around" should walk through that bulding and see all the empty cubes and look in all the studios that now contain nothing but PCs cranking out tunes, kinda like that internet thing. Amazing.

  98. Join this conversation.
  99. Madison Avenue Backs Google-AdMob Deal by Mark Walsh (Online Media Daily - Nov 9) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  100. Krishna Subramanian from Mobclix commented on Nov 10, 11:08 AM
    It is highly likely that this will only encourage more online Web advertisers to move more aggressively into the mobile advertising space in order to keep pace with Google. Just as there are many winners in the Web space, there will be multiple winners in the mobile space!

  101. Join this conversation.
  102. Rupert Threatens To Take His Content And Go Home by Gavin O'Malley (Around the Net In Online Marketing - Nov 9) 1 reply in last 24 hours; 1 reply total
  103. Kevin Pike from Sweet Spot Marketing commented on Nov 9, 6:17 PM
    Does Vegas have odds on this yet? I giving December 31st as the over/under on the no-follow tag.

    As @oilman says: If Rupert's threats turn to reality grab the popcorn, sit back, and watch and an empire crumble.

  104. Join this conversation.



MOST POPULAR CONVERSATIONS TODAY

MOST POPULAR LAST TWO WEEKS

Feedback Loop for Tuesday, November 10, 2009


Read rest of entry

Metrics Insider: The 'Big Challenge' According To Eric Schmidt

The 'Big Challenge' According To Eric Schmidt
by Pat LaPointe , Tuesday, November 10, 2009

I had a chance to talk briefly with Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, at last week's ANA conference. He'd just finished sharing his take on marketing and advertising with 1,200 of us representing marketers, agencies, and supporting service providers. Of relevance to Metrics Insider readers, he said: 

  • Google backed away from managing radio and print advertising networks due to lack of "closed loop feedback."  In other words, the company couldn't tell an advertiser IF the consumer actually saw the ad or if they acted afterwards. Efforts to embed unique commercial identifiers into radio ads exist, but are still immature. And in print, it's still not possible to tell who (specifically) is seeing which ads -- at least not until someone places sensors between every two pages of my morning newspaper.

  • Despite this limitation, Schmidt feels that Google will soon crack the code of massive multivariate modeling of both online and offline marketing mix influences by incorporating "management judgment" into the models where data is lacking. This will enable advertisers to parse out the relative contribution of every element of the marketing mix to optimize both the spend level and allocation - even taking into account countless competitive and macro-environmental variables.

  • That "everything is measurable" and, according to Schmidt, Google has mathematicians who can solve even the most thorny marketing measurement challenges.

  • That the winning marketers will be those who can rapidly iterate and learn quickly to reallocate resources and attention to what is working at a hyper-local level, taking both personalization and geographic location into account.

    On all these fronts, I agree with him (I've actually said these very things in this column over the past few years).

    So when I caught up with Schmidt in the hallway after his speech, I asked two questions:

    1.     How credible are these uber-models likely to be if they fail to account for "non-marketing" variables like operational changes affecting customer experience, and/or the impact of ex-category activities on customers within a category (e.g. how purchase activity in one category may affect purchase interest in another)?

    2.     At what point do these models become so complex that they exceed the ability of most humans to understand them, leading to skepticism and doubt fueled by a deep psychological need for self-preservation?

    His answers:

    1.     "If you can track it, we can incorporate at into the model and determine its relative importance under a variety of circumstances. If you can't, we can proxy for it with managerial judgment."

    2.     "That is the big challenge, isn't it?"

    So, my takeaway from this interaction is: Google will likely develop a "universal platform" for market mix modeling, which in many respects could be more robust than most of the other tools on the market, especially in terms of seamless integration of online and offline elements, and Web-enabled simulation tools. While it may lack some of the subtle flexibility of a custom-designed model, this platform will likely be "close enough" in overall accuracy, given that it could be a fraction of the cost of custom, if not free. The tool will likely evolve faster to incorporate emerging dynamics and variables, as the company's scale will enable it to spot and include such things faster than any other analytics shop.

    If Google has a vulnerability, it may be underestimating the human variables of the underlying questions (e.g. how much should we spend and where/how should we spend it?) and of the potential solution.

    Reflecting over a glass of cabernet several hours later, I realized that Google's developments are generally good for the marketing discipline, as the company will once again push us all to accelerate our adoption of mathematical pattern recognition as inputs into managerial decisions. Besides, the new human dynamics this acceleration creates will also spur new business opportunities. So everyone wins.

     

    Pat LaPointe is Managing Partner at MarketingNPV -- specialty consultants on marketing measurement and metrics, and publishers of MarketingNPV Journal, available online free at http://www.MarketingNPV.com

    Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this newsletter -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.


  • Metrics Insider for Tuesday, November 10, 2009:
    http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=117187


    You are receiving this newsletter at phamquochuy1980.haiphong@blogger.com as part of your membership with MediaPost.
    If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - www.mediapost.com - and become a complimentary member.
    For advertising opportunities see our online media kit.
    If you'd rather not receive this newsletter in the future click here.
    email powered by eROIWe welcome and appreciate forwarding of our newsletters in their entirety or in part with proper attribution.
    (c) 2009 MediaPost Communications, 1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001




    Read rest of entry

    Just An Online Minute... Do The Yeah Yeah Yeah(s) Have A Map(s) For That?


    Kelly Samardak Tuesday, November 10, 2009

    Do The Yeah Yeah Yeah(s) Have A Map(s) For That?

    Yeah Yeah Yeahs Celebrate Motorola Droid, Angel Orensanz Foundation, New York
    November 6, 2009

    Yesterday you and I hopped on the Great Space Coaster and landed on Sesame Street for either a throat-choking blast of nostalgia or a moment of "yup, this is my life."  In fact, while I stood in the sun tweeting "surreal, standing in the sun listening to Elmo Song" a high school friend replied, "That's my every Monday." Ageless, that "Sesame Street."  I like to think that the adult Sesame Street, at least for us childless freewheeling urban dwellers, resides in music venues, off-Broadway, parks, and ferries.  And last Friday night I was the +1, attending a secret show to celebrate the Motorola Droid. Or Verizon Motorola Droid? Anyway...

    Fridays present tough choices, always.  On one hand I want to hang out with friends and/or the boy, who I haven't seen all week due to parties for this column.  On the other, more introverted hand, I want to make sweet sweet love to my couch, some pizza, and "Desperately Seeking Susan."  I've discovered, however, that if I force myself to do something, just a little something, on Friday night, the weekend actually seems longer.  The promise of a performance by The Yeah Yeah Yeahs made my decision that much easier. My dude works for ADA Music and Verizon is a client of his, so I was happy to wear the invisible +1 cloak for once.  

    I was only a little leery about the event itself because last time I went to the Angel Orensanz Foundation for the Arts for a "private show," it was pouring buckets of frog-sized rain plops and the line was too long to deal with.  When we arrived, there was no line to be seen, yay!  Should there be a line, it was split into two, one for printed tickets and one for, gasp!, mobile tickets. 

    Stepping into the venue was like stepping into Max Headroom's (dig back, people, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy back) private disco.  The stage was flanked by vertical pipes of red lighting (I'll assume LED, since we're all so green nowadays). Surrounding the room were spotlights flopping back and forth with tubes of white, purple and red beams.  The simple brushed-copper (at least, in the dark that's how they appeared) candelabras absorbed the purple light, mesmerizing some of the altered guests (ahem, just standing next to some of you gave me the munchies).  The wristband dealers stood directly in front of cornea-disintegrating, vertically flashing blasts of white light, handing out bands and drink chips (poker chips are the new tickets) with cute little droid logos on them.

    Friday vodka drink in hand, the boy and I propped ourselves at the back of the crowd while the Yeah Yeah Yeahs took the stage.  Being a tragic 4'11" means I only really get to see the band when they propel themselves into the air or if I'm on an incline, say, in the lawn at Merriweather.  This was not the case Friday night.  Every once in a while I'd see Karen O's melon-cat-haired head boink up above the crowd, or her mic-wrapped hand gesturing slowly during MAPS.  It didn't matter, though.

    If I liked the band moderately before, I think the light show and their much longer-than expected performance (promo stuff is usually a four-song montage and done) may have brought me closer to superfandom.  You can't deny that hipster disco beat!

    Even on days when I'm not intending to think about work, my brain rats me out.  I left the venue wondering about the budget it takes to put together an event like that.  I'm sure the Yeah Yeah Yeahs aren't available for weddings and bar mitzvahs, so that had to cost an arm and a leg.  Droid/Motorola/Verizon must have the marketing budget dreams are made of.

    As a side note, Yeah Yeah Yeahs guitarist, Nick Zinner lives across the street from me.  I plan to accost him next time I see him.  You know, to tell him "Awesome show, great job!"

    See what I see in the Flickr set!

    Send invitations to kelly@mediapost.com!

    Please pardon the Yeah Yeah Yeahs lyric/song oddly placed headline tie in. 

     

     
    You are receiving this newsletter at phamquochuy1980.haiphong@blogger.com as part of your free membership with MediaPost. If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - www.mediapost.com - and click on [subscribe] in the e-newsletter box.
    For advertising opportunities see our online media kit.
     
    If you'd rather not receive this newsletter in the future you can unsubscribe now by clicking here.
     
    email powered by eROIWe welcome and appreciate forwarding of our newsletters in their entirety or in part with proper attribution.
    (c) 2009 MediaPost Communications, 1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001


    Read rest of entry

    SearchMarketingDaily: Google, Yahoo, Microsoft Ignite Free Public Wi-Fi War -- And Holiday Cheer


    Welcome to SearchMarketingDaily, a new daily publication from MediaPost dedicated to the field of search engine marketing. Each business day, SMD will provide you with the most relevant mix of breaking news, insights, data and commentaries about the rapidly changing field of search from across the spectrum of MediaPost publications, and from a variety of other leading news organizations, blogs, and Twitter feeds.

    The centerpiece of each daily edition will be SearchBlog, a new column written by MediaPost's resident search marketing expert, Laurie Sullivan, which will set the agenda with the latest news, trends and insights shaping the world of search. SMD will also incorporate all the news you've been reading in Around the Net in Search, and the SearchDailyFeed.

    Please pass along any thoughts or recommendations you have about SearchMarketingDaily, and if you don't find it's suited for you, you can opt-out immediately by clicking here.

    Joe Mandese
    Editor-in-Chief
    MediaPost


    Search Marketing Daily Search Marketing Daily
    Tuesday, November 10, 2009
    by Laurie Sullivan
    Search engines' generous move -- providing consumers with free public WiFi access, and charities a bit more in their coffers -- might also give advertisers a few more clicks and conversions. ... Read the whole story

    by Laurie Sullivan
    OneRiot and search engine Taptu plan to announce Tuesday that people now have an option to browse the Web for trending topics and the most relevant results on the mobile phone. While 'real-time search' has become the latest buzzword on the Web, some want to know if targeted ads in real-time search on mobile networks will follow. ... Read the whole story
    by Joe Mandese
    In what may be tantamount to a Custer's Last Stand for the newspaper industry's premium content model, News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch Monday declared he would remove his company's newspaper stories - including those of the Wall Street Journal - from Google's search index files as a means of encouraging people to pay for their content online. In an interview with News Corp.'s Sky News Australia, Murdoch said they might block Google entirely, raising questions about what might happen to the relevance of the newspaper's content in an era when many people discover it first via search. ... Read the whole story
    by Mark Walsh
    Agencies and even rival mobile ad networks appeared to welcome Google's proposed $750 million acquisition of AdMob announced Monday as a ringing endorsement of the emerging mobile ad market. The hefty sum that Google is willing to spend to snap up the leading mobile ad network shows that the long-hyped potential of mobile advertising is finally becoming a reality, they say. ... Read the whole story
    by Laurie Sullivan
    Google announced Monday that it will acquire AdMob, a mobile display ad technology provider, for $750 million in stock. The company expects the deal to help it develop more effective tools for creating, serving and analyzing emerging mobile ad formats on mobile phones. ... Read the whole story
    by Laurie Sullivan
    Microsoft's Bing and JiWire will announce Monday an advertising campaign that lets consumers gain free WiFi Internet access at participating hot spots in exchange for one search on the engine. ... Read the whole story



    by Kaila Colbin
    In the months straddling 2000-2001, I had the good fortune to lead the ParentsConnected Nationwide Seminar Tour alongside my business... More
    by Wendy Davis
    The Georgia newspaper Columbus Ledger-Enquirer can't post Twitter updates about a drug trafficking trial, a federal judge has ruled. In... More
    by Derek Gordon
    At Ad:Tech last week, one message I heard, over and over again, is that people seem exhausted by the huge... More
    Around the Net
    Dust off the crystal ball. You will likely recognize all the faces in this video interview from Ad:Tech...
    Brad Geddes explains the changes to Google Analytics and provides some tips on how to get a better...
    Free WiFi -- it's the gift that just keeps on giving, which partly explains why so many online...
    Juan Carols Perez believes Microsoft has, for the most part, been able to earn a prominent spot at...
    Harry Gold shows us how to tie predictive modeling to display ads. He explains it's important to set...
    Siddharth Shah suggests optimizing brand keywords based on a campaign's return on investment --...
    In an interview with Shagun Vatsa, local search expert David Mihm describes some of the changes he has...
    How do you calculate the true cost of SEO? Eric Enge tells us. Changes in domain, URL,...

    Departments


    Read rest of entry

    Section 2-Around the Net in Online Marketing: The New Freemium: WiFi

    , November 10, 2009

    The New Freemium: WiFi
    GigaOm et al.
    Free WiFi -- it's the gift that just keeps on giving, which partly explains why so many online companies are giving it to consumers this holiday season. This fall, both Google and Microsoft announced free WiFi promotions. As of today, Google is providing free WiFi on every Virgin America flight throughout the holiday season. (Google is also giving away free Wi-Fi in 47 airports across the U.S., including hubs such as Miami, Seattle, Houston and San Jose, Calif. The promotions will last through Jan. 15, 2010.)

    Microsoft is teaming up with mobile ad network JiWire to provide free WiFi at airports and hotels, so long as users agree to conduct a single search on Bing. A JiWire executive tells MediaPost's own Laurie Sullivan that response has been "off the charts." eBay, meanwhile, is sponsoring free WiFi on 250 flights on Delta Airlines during the week of Thanksgiving, and WiFi users will get access to the eBay home page and an invitation to shop there.

    Also as of today, Yahoo is providing free WiFi for an entire year in Times Square, to "be at the center of people's online lives," a company rep tells paidContent. The center of consumers' lives idea is also the theme of the company's ongoing $100 million ad campaign.

    GigaOm's Om Malik -- who doesn't suffer fools, or foolish marketing ploys, lightly -- actually applauds the efforts. Reminding us that these services are only "free" as long "as long as you watch an ad or a promo for whichever company is sponsoring it," Malik says "the idea of free WiFi-based marketing is actually pretty smart."

    With regard to Google's efforts, he says: "Given that many of the estimated 100 million travelers who will spend time in airports with Google-sponsored Wi-Fi will at some point in time encounter Google ads, the decision is more than a nice gesture. Google providing access to free Wi-Fi is kind of like publishing those free magazines littering coffeehouses. It's all about the ad revenue."

    Regarding Microsoft's campaign, the Blog Herald says "it might actually achieve its purpose -- that is to make more people aware of Bing and let them try the search engine. But the question is, will this be enough to make users continue to use it once the Wi-Fi access is no longer free?"

    "Who expected the search wars to open a new front involving WiFi?" remarks Greg Sterling on Search Engine Land, adding: "All these efforts are welcome but they're only temporary ... Eventually there will be ubiquitous WiFi/4G connectivity that will enable people out in the world to connect at higher speeds, hopefully for lower cost, than they can today through traditional WiFi networks."

    Either way, we have to agree with Gizmodo's final analysis that "Holiday season air travel just got a little less crappy."    - Read the whole story...

    Early Droid Sales Close, But No iPhone
    Bloomberg
    During its first weekend on the market, analysts are estimating that Motorola sold a respectable 100,000 Android-powered Droid phones. By contrast, Apple sold more than 1 million of its latest iPhone model in its weekend debut in June. Still, Broadpoint AmTech analyst Mark McKechnie tells Bloomberg that the numbers are "encouraging." "There seems to be pretty good demand -- they've taken the right steps and picked a good partner with Google on the Android side."

    Verizon Wireless, the carrier for the device, had 200,000 Droid phones on hand, and most stores sold at least half of their stock. Including other models, Motorola will sell 1 million phones based on Google Inc.'s Android software in the fourth quarter and 10 million in 2010, McKechnie estimates. - Read the whole story...

    Is LinkedIn's Twitter Tie-Up Desperate?
    eweek
    LinkedIn will now let members of its community feed their status to Twitter, and to their LinkedIn connections. Status updates have been an important part of LinkedIn, with working professionals using it to alert others to sales leads, new jobs and other business opportunities, writes eWeek. But, Twitter is fast becoming Web users' official status update, with millions of users blasting out messages to followers each day.

    Also of note, LinkedIn's membership growth has cooled in the last two years, while Facebook has soared to more 300 million users, sparking speculation that many people have turned to the leading social network for their personal and professional connections. The move is therefore being perceived as somewhat desperate -- even every company, from Google to Microsoft, is racing to partner with Twitter these days. - Read the whole story...

    Amazon Bows Kindle App For PCs
    PCWorld
    Apple isn't the only company churning out apps these days. Amazon just released a Kindle for PC app, available as a free download for Windows 7, Vista, and XP. Similar to the Kindle for iPhone app, Kindle for PC syncs a consumer's Amazon e-book downloads, and shows them on their computer for convenient reading either when they're away from their e-book reader or don't own one. Amazon also says a Mac version is "coming soon." "Though not necessarily revolutionary," PC World says "the Kindle for PC app does the job." By offering additional portability, Amazon's broader aim is to dissuade e-book users from adopting competing technologies. Yet, argues PC World: "Until Amazon loosens its DRM and embraces the burgeoning ePub standard, the company may experience roadblocks as e-book readers evolve." - Read the whole story...

    Google Street View Completes U.S. Effort
    Softpedia
    Google Street View has officially finished visually cataloging all 50 US states. To mark the occasion, Google has launched an online gallery with some of what it considers to be most interesting imagery in Street View, including Alcatraz Island in San Francisco and the Kennedy Space Center. Google has also been working to bring even more locations to Street View, which have been previously impossible to reach. With the Street View "trike," Google can go to many places it otherwise wouldn't be able to go to and, after visiting some famous locations in Europe, it's bringing it stateside. In total, Google has gathered over 25,000 suggestions and has culled them to create several categories in which people can vote to support their favorite locations. - Read the whole story...

    Twitterer Lands CBS TV Deal
    THR's The Live Feed
    CBS has picked up a comedy project based on the Twitter account "Shit My Dad Says," which has attracted over 700,000 followers since launching in August. "Will & Grace" creators David Kohan and Max Mutchnick are set to executive produce and supervise the writing for the "multicamera" family comedy, which author Justin Halpern will co-pen with Patrick Schumacker. Halpern and Schumacker will also co-exec produce the Warner Bros. TV-produced project. After moving back in with his parents in San Diego, Halpern, 28, launched the Twitter account to document his 73-year-old father's priceless rants and remarks such as, "Sometimes life leaves a hundred-dollar bill on your dresser, and you don't realize until later that it's because it fucked you." - Read the whole story...



    Online Media Daily - Around the Net for Tuesday, November 10, 2009
    http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showEdition&art_send_date=2009-11-10&art_type=42

     

    You are receiving this newsletter at phamquochuy1980.haiphong@blogger.com as part of your membership with MediaPost.
    If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - www.mediapost.com - and become a complimentary member.
    For advertising opportunities see our online media kit.
    If you'd rather not receive this newsletter in the future click here.
    email powered by eROIWe welcome and appreciate forwarding of our newsletters in their entirety or in part with proper attribution.
    (c) 2009 MediaPost Communications, 1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001


    Read rest of entry

    Mobile Insider: Google Eats AdMob: Round Up the Usual Suspects

    Google Eats AdMob: Round Up the Usual Suspects
    by Steve Smith , Tuesday, November 10, 2009

    Yesterday, some of the media seemed shocked... shocked... to discover that Google was interested in mobile marketing. While the dowry of $750 million seemed overly generous to most of us, the marriage itself is unsurprising. AdMob's self-service model and roots in performance advertising map nicely against Google. Some recent stat from Google revealed that it sees 50 times more searches coming from iPhones than any other mobile source, and AdMob is rumored to have a large share of the display market on that platform. It all makes sense on paper. 

    Until we see how Google invests in and integrates AdMob, I am not as inclined as most to call this a "game-changer." Having seen that "game-changing" AOL buyout of Third Screen years ago, Microsoft's acquisition of Screen Tonic and Nokia's of Enpocket, I prefer to wait and see what talent stays or goes and how much Google subordinates the mobile ad network to everything else. Given the checkered history of mobile ad network buyouts, it is unclear what a larger Web company really wants to do (or knows what to do) with a mobile network and its technology. Things change when a company gets eaten, especially by a company whose bread is buttered so well elsewhere. The more interesting piece will be how the rest of the ad networks respond over time, whether Google comes back to eat another one of the fish in the pond, or whether some of the remaining fish start eating one another.

    I prefer to take the approach of Captain Renault in "Casablanca": AdMob has been eaten, round up the usual suspects. I pinged all of the CEOs at the ad networks that didn't get tapped for this deal to ask their first impressions. And yes, almost all did say that it "validates" the market for the rest of them.

    But just to get it out of the way: Paul Palmieri, CEO of that other enormous mobile net Millennial Media, calls the deal "astounding" insofar as Google seems to be acknowledging in the buy that mobile is not a mere extensions of the Web.. "Today Google validated what many companies including Millennial have thought for years - that mobile is a different market with a huge potential for advertising; possibly a bigger opportunity than online media."

    Dave Gwozdz, CEO of Mojiva, liked the fact that Google was willing to pay dearly for AdMob. "The market has definitely matured to the point where it makes sense for online behemoths to try to combine networks, analytics and delivery technologies in the hopes of capturing a share of this growing market," he says.

    JumpTap, which claims its search and carrier data gives it superior targeting capabilities in the market, says it anticipated consolidation. When I spoke with CEO Paran Johar for the current OMMA magazine cover article on the mobile ad net "wars," he noted the inevitability of a shakeout.

    Yesterday in a statement, Johar acknowledged that Google/AdMob does put some competitive pressure on the market. "The industry front runner will be determined by who can deliver the most advanced targeting capabilities for better ROI for advertisers and publishers."  

    Like Palmieri, Quattro Wireless's Andy Miller sees Google recognizing the need for discrete technology and skill sets to deploy mobile well. Additionally, he says, "This is a catalyst event, so likely it will make other players take a look at what they need to do to take advantage of the growth in consumer, advertiser and publisher interest in mobile to impact their own growth."

    While the ad nets see Google's buy-in as acknowledgement of mobile's exceptional nature, ADObjects CEO Matthew Snyder comes at it from the opposite angle. "This is an indication of the convergence of mobile and online," he says. The traditional Web players are positioning themselves to extend dominance onto the mobile Web. They are in the better position to buy their way onto carrier decks, and so the remaining ad nets may do well to look for their own Google. "If the others do not exit fast to the likes of AOL, Yahoo, [and] Microsoft, then the mobile-only approach will start to suffer, as there is really only one Internet."

    Joy Liuzzo, Senior Director of Mobile Research at InsightExpress, echoes my sense that this deal all boils down to what Google really wants to do with AdMob. There is a tremendous opportunity here for great ad targeting from search box data as well as a richer, more monetizable development platform across both iPhone and Android. "Mobile doesn't need to be validated, it needs a huge infusion of cash to drive development and get over some serious hurdles," she says. "Money is what Google can provide, and they are getting a nice base -- and proven reputation -- to build from."

    And lest we forget: How long ago did Google buy DoubleClick? Meanwhile, the proliferation of ad networks only widened. Finally, in the last few months we see Google making its more serious attempt to integrate these businesses in the new ad exchange. The game has barely started, let alone been changed.   

     

      

    Contributing writer Steve Smith is a lapsed academic who saw the light, bolted the University and spent the last decade as a digital media critic and consultant. He is chair and programmer of OMMA Mobile and OMMA Behavioral conferences from Mediapost and is the Digital Media Editor at Media Industry Newsletter (MIN) from Access Intelligence. Contact him here.

    Do you have strong opinions and inside knowledge about the topic of this newsletter -- and do you want to share your insights, observations and points of view regularly with the readers of MediaPost? To be considered as a MediaPost contributing writer, please send pertinent info about your credentials, plus several column ideas and one example of your writing on the topic, to pfine@mediapost.com. Please see our editorial guidelines here first.


    Mobile Insider for Tuesday, November 10, 2009:
    http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=117184


    You are receiving this newsletter at phamquochuy1980.haiphong@blogger.com as part of your membership with MediaPost.
    If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - www.mediapost.com - and become a complimentary member.
    For advertising opportunities see our online media kit.
    If you'd rather not receive this newsletter in the future let us know.
    email powered by eROIWe welcome and appreciate forwarding of our newsletters in their entirety or in part with proper attribution.
    (c) 2009 MediaPost Communications, 1140 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10001




    Read rest of entry

    Reuters US: Latest News

     

    Followers

    Recent Posts

    SOUVENIAONLINE Copyright © 2009 Black Nero is Designed by Ipietoon Sponsored by Online Business Journal